Examine one of the cases below in-depth. Explain the core legal issue and how it applies to legal issues in modern day homeland security.

SEE ATTACHMENT FOR LINKS IN ARTICLE AND QUESTIONS
This week examines four significant cases in understanding the legal basis for many of the Post 9/11 Supreme Court Cases. Examine one of the cases below in-depth. Explain the core legal issue and how it applies to legal issues in modern day homeland security.
part 2
What is the significance of Military Tribunals in today’s environment? How do you rationalize the finding in Johnson v Eisentrager, 339 US 763(1950)? Could the analysis in Eisentrager scrutiny withstand today’s war on terror?
Also please give your thoughts on this recent news article below
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/25/some-folks-were-tearful-cia-waterboarding-on-trial-in-guantanamo
Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856)
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)
Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942)
IMPORTANT- Please DO NOT just summarize the cases in your response but provide some analysis based on the case in the context of current legal issues.

The post Examine one of the cases below in-depth. Explain the core legal issue and how it applies to legal issues in modern day homeland security. appeared first on Assignment Prep.

Reference no: EM132069492

error: Content is protected !!