using this information write a rearch proposal and a final proposal the topic is Misleading “Natural” Claims in
the Food Industry
Instructions
Write a brief research proposal in which you identify a topic that you want to address and define the existing context for the topic, including how different groups have engaged with the topic.
Your research proposal should
Offer a specific research question and thesis for your proposed project
Provide enough context to explain why the topic is relevant and how it has been addressed by other writers
Make clear how your project will add new insight to a contested issue relevant to the topic, whether through offering new information or analysis, proposing a solution, or extending existing perspectives in novel ways
Objectives
In this project, you will
Identify a topic that you will research further in this course
Narrow your focus from a topic to a specific issue
Demonstrate your ability to analyze existing perspectives on the topic
Develop a research question focusing on the issue you will pursue
Articulate and develop your own perspective on a relevant issue
Research Question:
How do the labeling
practices, in the food industry that use the term “Natural” impact how
consumers perceive and act and what changes in regulations could guarantee
labels that’re more precise and significant?
Thesis:
Currently the regulations regarding labeling food as
“natural” can be a bit unclear. This leads to some companies possibly
claiming their products are “natural” when that may not be entirely
accurate. It’s important to address this issue by clarifying the definition of
“natural” ensuring companies adhere to the guidelines and do not
misrepresent their products as “natural” and educating consumers on
what “natural” entails. By doing we can promote transparency in food
labeling. Empower individuals to make informed choices while shopping for groceries,
ultimately ensuring they receive the quality products they expect.
Context and Relevance:
The government has guidelines for defining “natural” that
aren’t to set. In a way It’s similar, to being told that your go to snack is “natural”
just because it’s not artificial. Therefore, just because a product is labeled
as “natural” it may not always align with your expectations.
Some individuals believe that foods labeled as such are
healthier, for both our bodies and the environment. However certain companies
misuse the term by applying it to products that contain ingredients and
chemicals. Despite these additives they continue to market their products as
“natural.” While some food manufacturers claim transparency in their labeling practices,
we can argue that the lack of regulations makes it easy to deceive consumers.
Scientists advocate for labeling standards to ensure consumers are informed
about their purchases. The definition of “natural” is not straightforward. It
can lead to confusion among consumers, like us.
Contribution to
Existing Literature:
The focus of this study aims to explore how people respond
to labels and whether they influence us to purchase items that may not be as
beneficial as we think. Additionally, it will investigate our level of trust in
the food industry and the transparency of their practices. The study intends to
establish guidelines for defining “natural” so that food companies cannot
deceive consumers. It will also shed light on the importance of understanding
the contents of our food and ensuring companies uphold standards. This research
holds significance in safeguarding consumer wellbeing and promoting
transparency within the food industry. Through ideas and strategies this
project seeks to facilitate discussions on food labeling accuracy and ensure
consumers receive products that meet their expectations.
