Critically explores burnout and reduced team effectiveness using statistic/data and tools (if relevant) Addresses xyz organisational effectiveness and performance. Use of leadership theories and models relevant to healtheare

• PARTS

YES

NO

PARTS 1: 1500-word Critical Analysis

INTRODUCTION

•       
Clear organizational structure and demography of xyz
healthcare.

MAIN BODY: 

•       
Critically explores burnout and reduced team
effectiveness using statistic/data and tools (if relevant)

•       
Addresses xyz organisational effectiveness and performance.

•       
Use of leadership theories and models relevant to
healthcare and application of systems thinking.

•       
Critical analysis of its effect on organisational
culture, health and wellbeing.

•       
Consideration of leadership impact on workforce wellbeing

•       
Identification of performance and quality
improvement challenges

•       
Evidence-based improvement strategies proposed

•       
Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4

Part 2: 15-minute Presentation with 500-word Speaker
Notes

•       
Introduction slide included

•       
Critical exploration of potential causes

•       
Application of tools and techniques from the module

•       
Implementation of Proposed leadership and
development strategy (from PART 1)

•       
Concluding critical reflection on organisational
issues

•       
Maximum of 11 slides

•       
Audio or video narration included.

•       
Speaker notes included after the 11 slides.

•       
Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 5

Part 3: 500-word Personal Development Plan (PDP)

•       
Use of self-assessment or diagnostic tools to
demonstrate awareness of personal leadership style

•       
Critical reflection on own leadership strengths and
development (using reflection models if relevant) and mapped against professional codes
(CMI COP and professional code of conduct if relevant)

•       
Short and long-term goals clearly defined (SMART,
PACT or equivalent) represented in a tabular format in the body of your
essay. (NOT in the appendix please)

•       
Actions for achieving identified goals including
evaluating methods for progress (Relevant
tools applied).

•       
Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 5

Mark Bands

Module LO1:

Critical

Exploration

of

Leadership

Theories and

Characteris tics of

Effective

Healthcare
Leaders 

Module LO2:

Analysis of

Systems Thinking in Health

Systems

Module LO3:

Evaluation

of

Challenges and

Effectivene

ss in

Leading

Quality

Improveme

nts

Module LO4:

Examinatio

n of Organisatio nal Culture,

Health, and

Wellbeing

in

Leadership

Module LO5:

Applicatio n of Tools and

Technique s for Self-

Developm ent in

Leadershi

p

Written and

Verbal

Presentation

,

Communicat ion, and

Design 

Outstand ing (80-

100%)

Demonstrat

es exceptional
critical analysis of leadership theories, leadership styles and impact,
effectively identifying characteristi cs of highly effective and strategic
healthcare leaders. Exceptional use of evidence and theory.

Provides an
outstanding

critical

analysis of
systems thinking in health systems, demonstrat ing deep understandi ng and
strong theoretical integration.

Demonstrat

es exceptional

evaluation of
challenges, effectivenes s, and impact in leading

quality

improveme

nts within
health systems. Strong

critical depth.

Provides
exceptional analysis of

organisation al
culture, health and wellbeing and their impact on leadership demonstrati ng
deep insights into health and wellbeing strategies.

Exceptiona lly applies diverse tools and

techniques

for self-

awareness

and self-

developme

nt, reflecting

critically on leadership growth with strong
evidence and

application

.

Exceptionally
clear, professional, creative and engaging written and verbal presentation.
Outstanding use of visuals, structure, and academic tone. Timing and delivery
of the verbal presentation are impeccable. Excellent use of relevant
references

Excellent (70-79%)

Provides a
thorough

critical
analysis of leadership theories and styles, with strong discussion of
effective healthcare leaders. Wellsupported

Offers a

comprehen

sive

analysis of
systems thinking within health systems, showing strong theoretical
connections and

Provides a
strong

evaluation of
leadership challenges

and quality
improveme

nts, with some

insightful
discussions.

Presents a
strong discussion of

organisation al
culture, health, and wellbeing, supported by relevant evidence and
theoretical insights.

Applies a variety of self-

awareness

and self-

developme

nt tools and techniques with

strong

critical reflection on their

Clear, creative
and professional written and verbal presentation with strong visuals and
structure, as appropriate. Timing and delivery of the verbal presentation

by evidence and
theory.

evidencebased
discussion.

impact on leadership developme nt.

are effective. Very
good use of relevant references.

Very

Good

(60-69%)

Offers a solid

discussion of
leadership theories, styles and characteristi

cs of effective
healthcare leaders.

Some minor gaps
in integrating evidence and theory.

Provides a very
good

analysis of
systems thinking, with relevant examples and discussion, though some areas
lack depth.

Evaluates
leadership challenges

and quality
improveme

nts with
relevant evidence,

but critical
depth may be inconsistent

.

Discusses
organisation al culture including health and wellbeing in leadership with
very good insight

and some
strategies

but may lack
critical

engagement

in certain
areas.

Applies self-

awareness

and self-

developme

nt tools and techniques but with

some gaps

in critical reflection and leadership

application

.

Very good
written and verbal presentation style and structure. Some minor issues with
visuals, tone, or timing, as appropriate. 
Good use of relevant references.

Good

(50-59%)

Provides a good

discussion of
leadership theories and styles,

though

critical depth
is limited.

Some

relevant
examples used.

Discusses
systems thinking in health systems but lacks depth or may rely on descriptive
rather than analytical points.

Presents a good
evaluation of leadership challenges

and quality
improveme nts.

Discussion is
present but lacks

strong

critical

engagement

.

Provides a good

discussion of

organisation al
culture and health and wellbeing. Some important areas may be underexplor ed.

Uses self-

developme

nt tools but lacks critical reflection
on their application to leadership growth.

Good written
and verbal presentation with noticeable errors in visuals, structure, or
timing.

Engagement may
be inconsistent. Good use of relevant references.

Pass (4049%)

Offers a
minimal

discussion of
leadership theories and styles with limited critical engagement.

Provides a
superficial analysis of systems thinking.

Some

points are
relevant but lack clear theoretical

Offers a
limited

evaluation of
leadership challenges

and quality
improveme nts.

Evidence

Discusses
organisation al culture and health briefly, but the discussion is superficial
and lacks strong

Demonstra

tes

minimal application

of self-

developme

nt tools, with little reflection on

Basic written
presentation with significant issues in visuals, tone, or structure. Timing
may be off.

Minimal use

Lacks depth in
analysis and supporting evidence.

connections

.

may be weak or
inconsistent ly applied.

supporting
evidence.

leadership impact.

of relevant
references. 

Fail (0-

39%)

Fails to
critically explore leadership theories and styles or identify key
characteristi

cs of effective
healthcare leaders. Discussion is vague or

unsupporte d by
evidence.

Fails to

demonstrat e an

understandi ng
of systems thinking in health systems. Analysis is weak or absent.

Fails to
evaluate leadership challenges

and quality
improveme nts.

Discussion may
be missing,

unclear, or

unsupporte d by
evidence.

Fails to
discuss organisation al culture including health and well-being and their role
in leadership. Evidence and theoretical connections are absent or
insufficient.

Lacks application

of self-

developme

nt tools and techniques, with no
meaningful reflection on leadership developme nt.

Poorly
structured and unclear presentation. Visuals and timing are inadequate.
Engagement is minimal or absent. References not included.