Blog

This semester we have examined the overarching question(s) of “What is the meani

This semester we have examined the overarching question(s) of “What is the meaning of life?” “How do we achieve happiness?” and “Is happiness the ultimate meaning or purpose of life?”  To me, it seems as though these are all inter-related questions.  And, so far, we have explored several texts, each of which has attempted to answer these inter-related questions: The History of Rasselas: Prince of Abissinia, Everyman, and The Poetry of Sappho.  Now, we come to The Consolation of Philosophy by Boethius.  
At first, it would seem these various texts may lead up to the study of Boethius.  However, except for Sappho’s writings, Boethius’s text predates the others since it was written around 524 A.C.E.  So, these disparate texts may have, in fact, been influenced by Boethius.  
It is an interesting text, at once espousing philosophies from ancient Greece (most often Plato and Aristotle) and mingling them with early medieval Christian beliefs.  All in all, the five books of The Consolationweave together a series of logical arguments. To what end? Perhaps to make the author feel better as he approached his doom.  In any case, his writings became a major influence on Western thought for the subsequent millennium, partly because he was able to support Christian beliefs with Classical Greek philosophy, all the while never mentioning anything overtly Christian!
So what shall we do with this text?  For this essay, I will give you some choices.  Please choose ONE of the following to respond to:
Choice #1
Consider showing the relationship between The Consolation and EITHER Rasselas or Everyman or Sappho. 
How do the two texts compare? How do they contrast? What ideas in Boethius are reflected in the other work?
Choice #2
Clearly explain – and follow Boethius’s entire train of logical argument – of ONE of the following discussions:
Providence and Fate
Free will and foreknowledge
Chance
Good and evil, reward and punishment
Fortune
True goodness and true happiness
Choice #3
Why and/or how did The Consolation of Philosophy appease Boethius in his dreaded time awaiting his doom?
Please DO NOT USE ANY OUTSIDE SOURCES for this essay.  Your Works Cited page should include only the text or texts we have read and discussed in class.  The usual formatting applies:
4+ pages in length
Plus a Works Cited page
MLA style, formatting
ON TOP WAS THE INSTRUCTION MY PROFESSOR WANTS/ YOU WILL DO CHOICE 1
remember to not make the essay wordy or use a higher level vocabulary. keep it straighfroward and creative. use academic words that most knows. don’t announce things in the essay like ” in this essay we will explore” my teacher hates that. have a smoother transition. keep the introduction interesting and your ideas to make sense. 
i also have an outline for the essay if u need it 
If you choose the following prompt:
OUTLINE OPTION #1 — COMPARISON-CONTRAST
Consider showing the relationship between The Consolation and ONE of the following texts: Rasselas or Everyman or Sappho.
How do the two texts compare (similarities)?
How do they contrast (differences)?
What ideas in Boethius are reflected in the other work?
You are really writing a comparison-contrast essay.  There are two basic ways to organize this type of essay, either the one-side-at-a-time method (for shorter, simpler discussions) or the point-by-point method (for longer, more complex discussions).  
We always write a comparison-contrast essay for a reason: to explain, to argue, to clarify, to entertain, and so on.  So, you need to figure out your focus or purpose for this essay.  That will determine what you say and how you say it.
Remember that when you are discussing your first topic (BOETHIUS), you are informing the reader.
You are presenting information – via quotations and explanations – about your first text.
Then, when you discuss your second text (either RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO), you are doing two things:
Informing the reader about the second text, via quotations
Explaining to the reader about the relationship between this text and Boethius. So, this is where you are making your comparison or contrast between the two texts. 
Whether we make a “pros” and “cons” list about a major life event or try to decide which brand of peanut butter we’re going to buy, we constantly compare and contrast ideas and items in our lives.  When we compare, we examine the similarities between things; when we contrast, we examine the differences between things.  
What, exactly, is a comparison-contrast essay composed of?  What do you need to think about when doing one?  Well, there are several things to think about.  
First, you need to decide on a purpose.Why are you making a comparison and/or contrast?  It isn’t enough to just compare and contrast two or more things.  You have to do that with some point in mind.  For example, you might want to show that two things are more similar (or different) than previously thought, or you might want to define two shades of an emotion or condition (such as happiness versus ecstasy); or you might want to dramatize the effects of drinking one glass of red wine at dinner, for good health, versus drinking a case of red wine at dinner, with the ill effects of such an action; or you might want to persuade readers that stricter divorce laws are needed by comparing the laws of several different states.  Regardless of the purpose, you must compare and contrast with a purpose in mind.  That purpose is one of the things that directs your essay.  The other thing that directs your essay is your audience – for whom are you writing?
Second, you need to make sure that the two (or more) things you’re comparing or contrasting are at least somewhat similar.You can, for example, compare a Ford and a Volvo because they’re both cars.  You could not compare a car with a lawnmower (with the possible exception of an old Volkswagen).  So, they need to have some related parts.
Third, you need to stay focused on your purpose.That is, you may want to inform (to present information as objectively as possible); to evaluate (as in pros and cons, with the goal of making some sort of judgment); to persuade (readers to take some action based upon your presentation of similarities or differences): to clear up misconceptions (by revealing previously hidden or misunderstood similarities or differences): or to draw an analogy between two seemingly unrelated subjects (such as a singles bar and a day at the zoo).  
Fourth, you need to come up with a strong thesis.Now, a thesis always states the subject under discussion and the author’s perspective, treatment of the subject, or point of view.  In a comparison-contrast essay, a thesis must do a few more things.  It should name the subjects being compared and contrasted; it should indicate whether the focus is on the similarities, the differences, or both; and it should state the main point of comparison or contrast.
Fifth, you need to select the points to be discussed.Consider your audience when doing this.  Be aware of what your readers know, what they don’t know, and what you can predict about their reactions.  This should influence your choices of what to include.  Of course, all of your points should support your thesis.
Sixth, organize your discussion.For a comparison-contrast essay, there are basically two ways to organize your material.  They are:
The one-side-at-a-time (sometimes called the “block”) method, which is organized like this:
Introduction
Subject “A”    – point 1
– point 2
– point 3, etc.
Subject “B”    – point 1
– point 2
– point 3, etc.
Conclusion
Note that the points discussed are the same and in the same order.  That makes for an easy comparison.  This type of organization is best used for shorter, simpler essays.
Then there’s the point-by-point method, which is best used for longer, more complicated essays.  It is organized like this:
Introduction
Point 1                        – subject “A” then subject “B”
Point 2                        – subject “A” then subject “B”
Point 3                        – subject “A” then subject “B”, etc.
Conclusion
Lastly, be aware of language, as always.In order to make sure that the reader understands the comparisons and contrasts that you’re making, you need to make sure that you’re clear.  Part of what makes this essay clear is good use of transitions, such as “also,” “in the same way,” “on the other hand,” or “likewise.”
ONE-SIDE-AT-A-TIME/BLOCK METHOD
Interest creator _______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Context _____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Thesis (Titles, Authors, Focus)  _____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Statement of organization (mention II, III, III, etc.) ___________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, topic sentence (BOETHIUS) ____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotation/point #1 _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotation/point #2 ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotation/point #3 ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Concluding sentence____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, topic sentence (RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotation/point #1 _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotation/point #2 ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotation/point #3 ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Concluding sentence____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, echo of thesis ________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Reminder of most important points ________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Connection to reader ____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
“Walk-away” thoughts ___________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
POINT-BY-POINT METHOD
Interest creator _______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Context _____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Thesis (Titles, Authors, Focus)  _____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Statement of organization (mention II, III, III, etc.) ___________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, topic sentence (BOETHIUS and either RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #1 (BOETHIUS) ___________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #1 (RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Concluding sentence____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, topic sentence (BOETHIUS and either RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #2 (BOETHIUS) ___________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #2 (RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Concluding sentence____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, topic sentence (BOETHIUS and either RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #3 (BOETHIUS) ___________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #3 (RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Concluding sentence____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, topic sentence (BOETHIUS and either RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #4 (BOETHIUS) ___________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #4 (RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Concluding sentence____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, topic sentence (BOETHIUS and either RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #5 (BOETHIUS) ___________________________________________________
POINT-BY-POINT METHOD (continued)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lead in, quotations/point #5 (RASSELAS or EVERYMAN or SAPPHO) ______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation, interpretation ______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Concluding sentence____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Transition, echo of thesis ________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Reminder of most important points ________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
Connection to reader ____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
“Walk-away” thoughts ___________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________

Related posts:

  1. Research Project Instructions: Sustainable Development: Research Paper: Each student should identify an area overburdened by pollution, applying EPA’s EJScreen: Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool (https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen), which combines environmental and socioeconomic information in the area. Then, she needs to write a paper between six and eight pages (including figures, tables, and references). See the required format below. EJSCREEN is an environmental justice mapping and screening tool that provides EPA with a nationally consistent dataset and approach for combining environmental and demographic i
  2. The Assignment: Choose one historical concept about the Dahomey women warriors addressed in Edna Bay’s “Women in Combat,” a review of Stanley B. Alpern’s text Amazons of Black Sparta: The Women Warriors of Dahomey. Then in a five-page critical analysis – using a Womanist, Afrofuturist framework – that discusse
  3. explain what you see as a key problem or problems with the role of the class action in modern civil litigation. In doing so, make sure you explain how class actions differ from ordinary civil litigation, and create additional challenges.
  4. complete two discussion forums during the course.  Each consists of an initial post of 400-500 words addressing an instructor-provided topic.  The forums also require responses to the posts of at least two classmates. Each response should be 150-300 words.