This is a continuation of the first and second
assignments and uses your accumulated research.
Imagine you are two different lobbyists, supporting tw
different sides of the policy issue you wrote about in
the Week 6 assignment, Analyzing Policy.
Submit your revisions from the Week 3 assignment,
Historical Perspective, and the Week 6 assignment,
Analyzing Policy based on your professor’s feedback.
You will be graded on your revisions. Then, write a 4-5
page paper in which you:
• Write a one-page position in favor of the policy.
• Write a one-page position against the policy.
• Write a one-page response to the argument in
favor of the policy.
• Write a one-page response to the argument
against the policy.
• Use at least two of the following arguments from
Chapter 10 in your paper: normative, positive,
anecdote, and evidence arguments. Clearly label
each to receive credit.
• Include at least four peer-reviewed references (n
more than five years old) from material outside
the textbook. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed
references include scholarly articles and
governmental websites. Wikipedia, other wikis,
and any other websites ending in anthing oth.