Overview In last week’s discussion, you identified a specific health care provid

Overview
In last week’s discussion, you identified a specific health care provider and analyzed one of their promotional materials. In this assignment, you will perform a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis on that provider.
Instructions
Preparation
Consider last week’s discussion and the feedback provided by your peers as you prepare for this assignment.
Consider how you would like to present your SWOT Analysis – PowerPoint or Word Document.
Deliverable
Do the following via your preferred delivery method:
Describe vital aspects of the provider to paint an accurate and comprehensive overview that includes areas such as its mission, market position, size, management, structure, et cetera.
Develop a SWOT analysis that accurately reflects and develops insights into the organization’s current state. It should include 2 strengths, 2 weaknesses, 2 opportunities, and 2 threats. Provide reasoning and support for each part of your analysis.
Analyze one of the four identified SWOT elements with respect to your provider’s ability to address the health care issue you identified in your first assignment. Examples are:
Strength: Adaptability. Analyze how the trait of adaptability would be useful to a nursing home’s response to an epidemic.
Threat: Staffing Shortages. Analyze how an increase in Fentanyl use in the local population might impact hospital staffing and training.
Weakness: Limited technology creates a connectivity challenge to being part of a health system or ACO.
Opportunity: Utilize excess space in their facility to network with a Hospice to afford inpatient support or create private state-of-the-art rooms for their labor and delivery services
Requirements
Your paper or presentation should include details that support your analysis. If PowerPoint is used, slides should be supported by detailed speaker’s notes.
You must cite a minimum of 3 credible resources to support your work. You can find sources through the Strayer Library using the library’s databases. To help with your research, additional resources are listed on the Course Resources page under Optional Resources.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Analyze management activities of a health services organization.
View Rubric
Week 7 Assignment – Strategies, SWOT Analysis
The last week’s topic I wrote about was dealing with COVID-19 in a hospital. This week, I 
wanted to do a powerpoint or something regarding Johns Hopkins Hospital and COVID-19.
Week 7 Assignment – Strategies, SWOT Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
Provide an overview of a selected provider that accurately depicts vital aspects of the organization.
15 to >13.49 pts
Exemplary
Provided an overview of a selected provider that accurately depicts vital aspects of the organization.
13.49 to >11.99 pts
Competent
Provided an overview of a selected provider that omits or misinterprets a significant aspect of the organization.
11.99 to >10.49 pts
Satisfactory
Provided an overview of a selected provider that omits or misinterprets multiple significant aspect of the organization.
10.49 to >8.99 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an overview of a selected provider that fails to convey basic corporate information.
8.99 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Does not submit a provider overview.
/ 15 pts
Develop a SWOT analysis (including two strengths of your provider, two weaknesses of your provider, two opportunities for your provider, and two threats to this provider).
52.5 to >47.24 pts
Exemplary
Submission includes a complete SWOT analysis that clearly identifies two strengths, two weaknesses, two opportunities, and two threats for the chosen provider.
47.24 to >41.99 pts
Competent
Submission includes a complete SWOT analysis that broadly identifies two strengths, two weaknesses, two opportunities, and two threats for the chosen provider.
41.99 to >36.74 pts
Satisfactory
Submission includes a SWOT analysis that broadly identifies at least one strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat for the chosen provider.
36.74 to >31.49 pts
Needs Improvement
Submission includes an incomplete SWOT analysis that broadly identifies the strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat categories, but does not have an example for each.
31.49 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Submission does not include any kind of SWOT analysis.
/ 52.5 pts
Provide clear reasoning and support for SWOT analysis conclusions.
30 to >26.99 pts
Exemplary
Provided clear reasoning and support from resources for each part of the SWOT, with at least two sentences to explain each.
26.99 to >23.99 pts
Competent
Provided reasoning and some support from resources for each part of the SWOT, with one to two sentences to explain each.
23.99 to >20.99 pts
Satisfactory
Provided some reasoning for each part of the SWOT, with at least one sentence to explain each.
20.99 to >17.99 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided very little reasoning for the SWOT and there may not be a full sentence to explain each.
17.99 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Provided no explanation for the SWOT analysis.
/ 30 pts
Provide a robust analysis of an identified SWOT element with respect to a provider’s ability to address an identified health care issue that would effectively inform decision-making. Provides specific examples to illustrate the analysis.
30 to >26.99 pts
Exemplary
Provided a robust analysis of an identified SWOT element with respect to a provider’s ability to address an identified health care issue that would effectively inform decision-making. Provides specific examples to illustrate the analysis.
26.99 to >23.99 pts
Competent
Provided a robust analysis of an identified SWOT element with respect to a provider’s ability to address an identified health care issue that would effectively inform decision-making. Provides no specific examples to illustrate the analysis.
23.99 to >20.99 pts
Satisfactory
Provided an analysis of an identified SWOT element with respect to a provider’s ability to address an identified health care issue that would minimally inform decision-making that lacked rigor to support the analysis.
20.99 to >17.99 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided a flawed analysis of an identified SWOT element with respect to a provider’s ability to address an identified health care issue that would not inform decision-making.
17.99 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not provide an analysis of a SWOT element with respect to a provider’s ability to address a health care issue.
/ 30 pts
Produce writing that is nearly free from spelling, punctuation, grammatical, and formatting errors. 0–2 errors present.
15 to >13.49 pts
Exemplary
Writing is nearly free from spelling, punctuation, grammatical, and formatting errors. 0-2 errors present.
13.49 to >11.99 pts
Competent
Writing has spelling, punctuation, grammatical, and formatting errors, but errors do not distract from the message. 3-4 errors present.
11.99 to >10.49 pts
Satisfactory
Writing has spelling, punctuation, grammatical, and formatting errors, but errors do not distract from the message. 5-6 errors present.
10.49 to >8.99 pts
Needs Improvement
Writing has spelling, punctuation, grammatical, and formatting errors that distract from the message in some places. 7-8 errors present.
8.99 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Writing has spelling, punctuation, grammatical, and formatting errors that distract from the overall message. More than 7 errors present.
/ 15 pts
Provide 3 or more supporting resources.
7.5 to >6.74 pts
Exemplary
Meets the required number of resources; all of which are of high-quality choices.
6.74 to >5.99 pts
Competent
Meets the required number of resources; some references are high-quality choices.
5.99 to >5.24 pts
Satisfactory
Does not meet the required number of resources; some references are poor-quality choices.
5.24 to >4.49 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not meet the required number of resources; all references are poor-quality choices.
4.49 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
No resources provided.
/ 7.5 pts
Total Points: 0