Your results say what happened. Your discussion explains why it happened and how much you trust it.
What to include
- What your results show, linked back to the aim
- How they compare with the expected or published value
- Sources of error, and which way each one pushed your result
- Concrete improvements for a repeat experiment
- A one-sentence conclusion
Avoid vague errors like “human error”. Name the step, the problem and its effect, for example “parallax when reading the burette, which overestimated the titre”.
